Apollo Investigation

Jack White's Apollo Studies 4

by Jack D White BA

large scale models of moon

Editor's Note: These images originally appeared on apolloreality and are obviously from various sources. There is no way of knowing whether the moon models depicted here were those actually used to simulate Apollo aerial imagery. However, views of the LM flying over the lunar surface are questionable (see later study Apollo 16 LEM retouched). Therefore models like these would have been required for the purposes of creating faked still photographs and film animations.



filming lunar aerial pictures



Convex Mirrors Comparison



Why astronaut shadows are anomalousShadow debunking

Editor's Note: This concise, well-presented conclusion must put into serious doubt the authenticity of these Apollo photographs. And then by implication, the authenticity of the entire Apollo photographic record – no doubt fulfilling the intentions of those whistle-blowers involved.

Thanks to Dave Greer for highlighting that fact that the previous version of this study required clarification.



'Sunlight' swaps sides during Apollo 12apollo investigation into hoaxed photos



Use of tripod on the Moon? 2use of tripod on moon



faked photos


Light direction anomalieshoaxed photos



lem off by 90 degrees



2 mutually exclusive views


Identical lunar module – different scalesnasa moon landing hoax


one more for the road
Editor's Note: See also later study on this finding: Wrecker on the Moon?


Suspect Surveyor lll in shadow

apollo investigation

Editor's Note: The deep gloom of the crater in the lower picture is totally inconsistent with the upper photo, In addition, there is lens flare in the color picture which is very unusual as a result of side lighting. Moreover, it is highly unusual to see a perfectly circular lens flare – see also later study NASA do(o)med? Look in the sky Chapter 7.


Another miniature stage set?miniature stage set

Next Study next page