Apollo Investigation

Jack White's Apollo Studies 4

by Jack D White BA
 

large scale models of moon

Editor's Note: These images originally appeared on apolloreality and are obviously from various sources. There is no way of knowing whether the moon models depicted here were those actually used to simulate Apollo aerial imagery. However, views of the LM flying over the lunar surface are questionable (see later study Apollo 16 LEM retouched). Therefore models like these would have been required for the purposes of creating faked still photographs and film animations.

 

 

filming lunar aerial pictures

 

 

Convex Mirrors Comparison

 

 

Why astronaut shadows are anomalousShadow debunking

Editor's Note: This concise, well-presented conclusion must put into serious doubt the authenticity of these Apollo photographs. And then by implication, the authenticity of the entire Apollo photographic record – no doubt fulfilling the intentions of those whistle-blowers involved.

Thanks to Dave Greer for highlighting that fact that the previous version of this study required clarification.

 

 

'Sunlight' swaps sides during Apollo 12apollo investigation into hoaxed photos

 

 

Use of tripod on the Moon? 2use of tripod on moon

 

 

faked photos

 

Light direction anomalieshoaxed photos

 

 

lem off by 90 degrees

 

 

2 mutually exclusive views

 

Identical lunar module – different scalesnasa moon landing hoax

 

one more for the road
Editor's Note: See also later study on this finding: Wrecker on the Moon?

 

Suspect Surveyor lll in shadow

apollo investigation

Editor's Note: The deep gloom of the crater in the lower picture is totally inconsistent with the upper photo, In addition, there is lens flare in the color picture which is very unusual as a result of side lighting. Moreover, it is highly unusual to see a perfectly circular lens flare – see also later study NASA do(o)med? Look in the sky Chapter 7.

 

Another miniature stage set?miniature stage set



Next Study next page
AULIS Online