One or two Apollo 15 craters?

 

 

 

Driving on the Moon?

 

 

 

Editor's Note: Please see the study below and Apollo 16 LEM changes mid air in a later Apollo 16 study by Jack White. And also see Further Findings.

 

 

Crude retouching of another Lunar Module

 

Doing the twist – Apollo 16

Editor's Comments:

1. Compare a similar scenario in previous Apollo 15 study: Doing the twist.

During his panorama research Jack White has found a number of anomalies, other than the visual problems he discusses within these studies. It is quite obvious (from the similar conclusions drawn independently by both Jack White and David Percy) that these 'composite panoramas' are full of discrepancies, as such they cannot be considered the true record of their purported lunar locations. See also later notes concerning Apollo 17 panoramas.

 

 

 

Jump Salute 1 – more wired action?

Editor's Note: This finding confirms Bennett and Percy's conclusions published in Dark Moon and What happened on the Moon? For more on continuity anomalies during the "jump salute" please read: Apollo Photo Anomalies. Compare also Too precise for words! in earlier studies.

 

 

Jump Salute 2

 

 

 

Editor's Comment: QUAD IV, the starboard side, was in fact the location for the Modularized Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a stowage bay. According to the record, the LRV was stowed on the port side, namely QUAD I. However, it should be noted that there were no still Hasselblad lunar surface photographs taken of the LRV in its stowed port-side position on any Apollo LEMs prior to unloading.

 

 

 

Editor's Comment: A distinctive feature of the Apollo 16 decal is the diagonal line across the US flag (as in the lower picture). However, this diagonal line (lanyard) is absent from the top image when the LM was allegedly in flight. See also previous study Computer reveals crude retouching of Apollo 16 LEM.

 

 

Rover fender repair anomaly

 

 

 

Same backdrops – different foregrounds

 

 

Frugal use of same props – again?

Editor's Comment: Only one major item is different – the US flag above the decal. No distinctive diagonal line (lanyard) accross the Apollo 17 flag. See also Apollo 16 LEM changes mid air, Anomalies with Apollo 16 LEM, and previous notes regarding the Apollo 15 stud:y Just a coincidence.

 

 

NASA could not have foreseen that photo analysis experts would make a detailed study of the backdrops (and the LEM positions in relation to these backdrops) to reveal the whistle-blowing fakery.

 

 

Uneven lighting on Apollo backdrop

 

 

Mountain backdrop stretch?

 

1970s a computer may have been used to stretch or compress. But the same result could have been achieved by either photo retouching, or by physical adjustment of the backdrop and the set.

 

 

 

Apollo 17 panorama mismatches

Editor's Comments: If both these panoramas are indeed depictions of the same location, features should correspond. For example, a 'new' or different hill is apparent to the left of the rover in the lower image – its 'arrival' cannot be due to the different lighting.

---